Suppose you are the economic adviser of a company producing three brands of mobile phones; Nokia 10 , Samsung X and iPhone Z. Suppose further that, your company currently sells 120 units of iPhone Z at ¢800 per unit, 150 units of Samsung X at ¢800 per unit and 200 units of Nokia 10 at ¢100 per unit, but in a bid to maximize profit, the company’s managing director proposes an increase in price of Samsung X from ¢800 to ¢1000 per unit for which quantity demanded is anticipated to fall from 150 to 100 units; iPhone Z from ¢800 to ¢1200 per unit for which quantity demanded is anticipated to fall from 120 to 100 units; and Nokia 10 from
¢100 to ¢200 per unit for which quantity demanded is expected to fall from 200 to 100 units.
1.Using the mid-point formula, compute the price elasticity of demand for each brand.
2. From your answer in i, what is the type and economic interpretation of each brand’s value of elasticity.
I)
"P_{ed}=\\frac{[\\frac{(Q_1-Q_0}{(Q_1+Q_2)\/2}]}{[\\frac{P_!-P_o}{(P_1+P_o)\/2}]}"
Here,
Q0 is the initial quantity demanded
Q1 is the quantity demanded after a price change
P0 is the initial price
P1 is the new price
a) price elasticity of demand for Nokia 10
Q0 = 200 units, and Q1 = 100 units
P0 = 100 per unit, and P1 = 200 per unit
"P_{ed}=\\frac{[\\frac{100-200}{(100+200)\/2}}{\\frac{200-100}{(200+100)\/2}}"
"P_{ed}=\\frac{-100}{150}\\times\\frac{150}{100}=1"
Therefore Price elasticity of demand for the Nokia 10, is 1.
b)price elasticity of demand for samsung X
Q0 = 150 units, and Q1 = 100 units
P0 = 800 per unit, and P1 = 1000 per unit
"P_{ed}=\\frac{\\frac{100-150}{(100+150)\/2}}{\\frac{1000-800}{(1000+800)\/2}}"
"P_{ed}\\frac{-50}{125}\\times\\frac{900}{200}=1.81"
Therefore Price elasticity of demand for Samsung X is 1.81.
c) price elasticity of demand for iphone z
Q0 = 120 units, and Q1 = 100 units
P0 = 800 per unit, and P1 = 1200 per unit
"P_{ed}=\\frac{\\frac{100-120}{(100+120)\/2}}{\\frac{1200-800}{(1200+800)\/2}}"
"P_{ed}=\\frac{-20}{100}\\times{1000}{400}=0.45"
Therefore Price elasticity of demand for iPhone Z is 0.45.
a) Nokia 10:
The elasticity of demand for Nokia 10 is 1.
Therefore Nokia 10 has a perfect elasticity of demand
This means proportionate change in the price and quantity demanded is the same.
There is an inverse relationship between quantity demanded and price with an equal proportion of change in quantity and price.
b) Samsung X:
The price elasticity of demand for Samsung X is 1.81.
1.81 is greater than 1 hence the demand for samsung X is relatively elastic. A small change in price results to a relatively high change in quantity demanded. The negative sign shows that there is a negative relationship between quantity demanded and price.
c) iPhone Z:
The price elasticity of demand for iPhone Z is 0.45.
0.45 is less than 1 meaning iphone z has a relatively les elastic or relatively inelastic demand.
An increase in price will have minimal impact on quantity demanded. The negative sign shows negative relationship between quantity demanded and price.
Comments
Leave a comment