Since basket "A" , containing "2" hamburgers and "10" milkshakes, his "MRS_{H,M}" is "8". At basket "B", containing "6" hamburgers and "4" milkshakes, his "MRS_{H,M}" is "\\frac12" .
At optimum, the indifferent curve is tangent to the budget line, so;
"MRS_{HM} \\to" At point A, the consumer has MRS of B but at point B, the MRS declines to "\\frac{1}{12}". This means Sandy was consuming more of hamburgers (H) and less of milkshake (M), and that Sandy was willing to give up more of hamburgers to get milkshake.
3.12. On a graph with the volume of steamed milk on the horizontal axis and the volume of espresso on the vertical axis,draw two of his indifference curves,U1 and U2,with U1 > U2.
Since each part of caffé latte has "0.25" part of espresso "(ES)" and "0.75" part of steamed milk "(SM)", the preferences indicate a perfect complementary relationship between espresso and steamed milk. This implies, "\\frac{ES}{SM} = \\frac{0.25}{0.75}\\ or\\ 3ES = SM."
The utility function is given by "U = min (3ES, SM)". We have "U_1 = 9" so that "SM = 9" and "ES = 3". Similarly, "U_2 = 2" where "SM = 2" and "ES = 0.67"
Comments
Leave a comment