Suppose the Fed were required to conduct monetary policy so as to hold
the unemployment rate below 4%, the goal specified in the
Humphrey–Hawkins Act. What implications would this have for the
economy?
2. The statutes of the recently established European Central Bank (ECB)
state that its primary objective is to maintain price stability. How does
this charter differ from that of the Fed? What significance does it have
for monetary policy?
3. Do you think the Fed should be given a clearer legislative mandate
concerning macroeconomic goals? If so, what should it be?
Solution:
According to the Humphrey-Hawkins Act, the rate of unemployment must be below 4% which can only be achieved by incentivizing and mobilizing corporates. This will lead to hyperinflation and higher levels of unemployment.
2.).No, the Fed should not be given a clearer legislative mandate.
The economy is a complex organism with many intertwined relationships. As a result, policy
decision may sometimes result in unexpected and/or unintended consequences. To account for
all this complexity policy makers are given the opportunity to exercise a degree of subjectivity
when necessary. If the mandate is made clearer, this opportunity would be taken away, which
may force policy makers to adopt policies they feel are not the best suited for the economic
conditions, and possibly result in undesirable long-term outcomes.
Comments
Leave a comment