1. Consider the following model of a hypothetical market for MSW management services:
MPB = 25 − 2Q
MPC = 4 + Q
MEC = 0.5Q,
where Q is the number of trash containers per household per month.
A. Quantitatively determine the effect of the resource misallocation due to: (12 marks)
a. the presence of the negative externality, and
b. the use of a flat fee pricing system in the presence of a negative externality.
Determine the dollar value of a waste-end charge that would restore efficiency to this market. Explain your answer intuitively.
A)
Markel for MSW management services.
Demand (D): MPB = 25 - 2Q
Supply (S): MPC = 4+Q
Demand = supply for equilibrium
"25-2Q = 4+Q\\\\\n\n21 = 3Q\\\\\n\nQ = 21 \/ 3\n\\\\\n= 7"
equilibrium quantity is Q = 7 at price
"P = 25-2(7) = 25-14 = 11"
The above equilibrium is when externality is not incorporated in supply function. When we consider the cost of externality, supply function is, $ = MPC + MEC = 4+Q+0.50Q
Demand = S'
"25-2Q = 4 +1.5Q\\\\\n\n21 = 3.5Q\\\\\n\nQ\u2081 = 6"
when cost of output reduces externality s considered, to Q₁ = 6 i (socially optimum output )
Resource misallocation 1 unit extra will be provided in the market negative externality is not considered.
flat fee pricing system is when a flat fee is charged for waste generated irrespective of quantity. Therefore marginal private cost ve cost is of additional зего ... waste MPC = 0 management service
equilibrium is where MPB = MPC
"25-20 M O\\\\\n\n2Q = 25\\\\\n\n= 12.5"
Resource mis allocation is 12.5-7 = 5.5 unit extra service demanded & supplied incase of flat fee pricing system.
B)
waste end charge is a fee charged at the time of disposal of waste It is based the amount / quantity go of waste generated to restore efficiency ,dollar value of MPC + MEC at the socially optimum level of output so that it covers both private cost of waste + social cost cost of externality. socially optimum level of output is Q₁ = 6 marginal social cost at this output is PE = 13 . Therefore fee of $13 / unit.
Comments
Leave a comment