Within a voluntary contribution game, the Nash equilibrium level of contribution is zero, but in experiments, it is often possible to sustain positive levels of contribution for a long period. How might we best explain this?
Participants are altruistic, and so value the payoff which other participants receive, benefiting (indirectly) from making a contribution.
Participants believe that if they make a contribution, then other participants will be more likely to make a contribution.
Participants have experience of working in situations in which cooperation can be sustained for mutual benefit and so have internalised a social norm of cooperation.
Participants in experiments believe that they have to make contributions in order to receive any payoff from their participation.
Participants have experience of working in situations in which cooperation can be sustained for mutual benefit and so have internalised a social norm of cooperation.
Comments
Leave a comment